a survey between falsehood and forbiddance

a survey between falsehood and forbiddance seyyed mohammad reza ayati [1] hooshang golmohammadi [2]   abstract one the important issues of jurisprudence is the issue of withholding judgment and religious restraining order. therefore, each of these orders are of different types. studying these orders and their types and also answering the question of what task these withholding judgment and religious restraining order bring on the people is considered very necessary and important. one of the important points in islamic schools is answering whether there is an implication between the forbiddance and the falsehood (as a withholding judgment) and the falsehood (as a religious restraining order) or not. since forbidding is considered forbiddance in lack of any opposite case, in this study it must be answered whether forbidding as it makes constraints on its object including the worships and transactions) causes the corruption and  the falsehood too or not. the great islamic scholars believe that forbidding in worships shows the falsehood of it but in the domain of transactions there is contradictions among the scholars. therefore, this study is to answer it through the analytic and descriptive method. keywords: forbidding, corruption, forbiddance, falsehood   [1] . professor at iau, tehran olum tahgighat branch, iran. [2] . faculty member at iau, bonab branch, iran.